Court Refuses Wife's Application for Relief from Sanctions

Service update: Unfortunately, Willett & Co no longer offer family law services. If you need assistance with divorce, financial remedy, or pre-nuptial agreements, please seek a specialist family solicitor. We continue to advise on private client, property, commercial, crime, employment and dispute resolution matters.

The Family Court has refused a wife’s application for relief from sanctions after she failed to comply with a court order requiring the timely filing and exchange of her witness statement in financial remedy proceedings. The judgment reinforces the importance of strict compliance with court directions in divorce and financial proceedings.

Case Background

In the case, a District Judge had ordered both husband and wife to file and exchange statements under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 outlining their financial circumstances and positions no later than 21 days before the final hearing.

While the husband filed his statement four days late, the wife’s statement was submitted 15 days after the deadline, and neither document appeared to have been properly filed or exchanged. Both statements were also longer than the permitted length set by the court.

Under Rule 22.10 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, if a witness statement is not served on time, that witness cannot give evidence without the court’s permission. Since time limits cannot be extended by agreement between the parties (per Rule 4.5(3)), the wife made a formal application for relief from sanctions but only during the final hearing itself.

Court’s Decision

The wife argued that her delay was caused by the husband’s failure to provide key financial information until shortly before the hearing. However, the Court found that this did not prevent her from preparing her own statement in good time. The Court also rejected her claim that the husband had suffered no prejudice, finding that her late statement severely reduced his time to review and respond.

The judge emphasised several factors against granting relief:

• Compliance with court orders is fundamental to the efficient and fair administration of justice.
• The application was not made promptly, having been delayed until the final hearing.
• The wife appeared to have made a conscious decision to delay her statement to include late information, rather than seeking an extension.
• Her explanations did not constitute a proper or good reason for the breach.
• The delay created unfairness by truncating the husband’s time to respond.

Considering all the circumstances, the Court concluded that granting relief would undermine the need for procedural discipline and fairness. The wife’s application was therefore refused.

Key Takeaway

This case serves as a reminder that court orders in divorce proceedings must be followed precisely, and delays can have serious consequences. The courts will only grant relief from sanctions where there is a compelling justification not simply where the breach causes minimal prejudice.

Q&A Section

Q: What is “relief from sanctions” in family law?
Relief from sanctions is a formal application asking the court to excuse a failure to comply with an order or rule for example, missing a filing deadline. It’s only granted if the applicant shows a good reason and that justice requires it.

Q: What are Section 25 statements?
Under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, both parties must provide full financial disclosure, including income, assets, liabilities, and financial needs, to help the court determine a fair outcome in financial remedy proceedings.

Q: What happens if a statement is filed late in family proceedings?
If a statement is served late, Rule 22.10 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 prevents the witness from giving evidence without the court’s permission. A late party must apply for relief but delay, poor reasons, or deliberate non-compliance will likely lead to refusal.

Q: How can parties avoid similar issues?
Parties should strictly follow all court timetables and seek legal advice early if difficulties arise. Solicitors can help request extensions properly, prepare documents on time, and ensure compliance with Family Procedure Rules.